Pricing

There is no licence fee, no seat count and no platform minimum, because there is no platform being sold. This is people doing work on your bill, and the fee is a share of the reduction they produce, verified against the invoice your provider sends you.

The short version: free audit, then 15-25% of verified monthly savings, measured against a baseline locked before anything changes. No savings, no fee. Thirty days notice. Minimum engagement is $20k/month of LLM spend. Book the audit.

The audit is free and it is a real deliverable

The first stage costs nothing and ends with a written document: spend broken down by model, workload and team, the drivers behind it, and a ranked savings list with an effort cost against each item. About a week from the point read-only exports are available.

You can take that document and implement all of it in-house. Plenty of platform teams do, and that is a legitimate outcome rather than a failed sales cycle. The audit is free because a proposal written without seeing the invoice is guesswork, and because a team that reads its own numbers and decides it does not need help was never going to be a good engagement.

Then 15-25% of verified savings

If you engage us to implement, the fee is a share of the reduction, billed each period, for as long as the reduction holds. Where it lands in the band depends on how much of the implementation sits with us rather than your engineers, and on the term.

In a period where the bill does not fall, the fee is zero. That is not a guarantee in the marketing sense, it is what a percentage of zero is.

What verified means, precisely

The model collapses if the baseline is soft, so this is the part worth reading slowly.

What is deliberately not priced separately

Charging for these individually would create incentives we do not want, so they are included.

One thing genuinely is not included: no dashboard is licensed to you. If continuous cost observability is something you want to own and operate, that is a separate product with separate pricing, and it does not require an engagement.

The incentive problems, stated plainly

Performance pricing has two well-known failure modes and naming them is fairer than hoping you do not.

When a fixed fee fits better

Performance pricing is wrong for some shapes of work. A one-off migration, an architecture review, or building out attribution and chargeback for a finance team is scoped work with a defined end, so it gets a fixed fee agreed up front. The percentage model is for ongoing optimisation of a live bill.

Next step: the audit costs nothing and ends with a number you can act on with or without us. Book a call, or email hello@finopsllm.com with your monthly spend and provider mix.

Back to FinOps LLM

FAQ

Why is there a $20k monthly minimum?

Below roughly that level a realistic percentage of a realistic saving does not cover the hours the work takes. Under the minimum the research library, cost calculator and pricing tracker are free and cover most of the same ground.

What happens to the fee if savings decay after implementation?

The fee decays with them. It is tied to the measured reduction in each billing period rather than to a projection made at signing, so a saving that stops being real stops being billable.

Do provider price cuts count as savings you bill for?

No. When a provider drops a list price your bill falls and our fee does not rise, because that reduction was not produced by any work on our side. It is excluded from the reconciliation.

Is there a lock-in period or a platform licence?

Neither. Thirty days notice on either side, and there is no software licence because this is an engagement rather than a product. Configurations and measurement setup stay yours afterwards.